Only one, when will the deluge start?

Thanks for the update Uplinger, but will that have any effect on the distribution of the WU's away from crunchers who have had high percentages of errors to positive returns? I guess everyone has had errors but the distribution seems to have been very uneven and hence some of us have only had a very small number of WU's in total (I've had less than 20 with only 14 validated) which could slew the stats against us for a while (or how long?) despite having v quick PC's. What's the score with this?

Thanks ZoSo - I've been crunching loads of other stuff as the DDDT2 is so unreliable for continuity, all others without a single error so it sounds as though it should be self correcting in due course.

uplinger: "If you have any questions, feel free to ask" ...
1. When does the change happen to the max no of errors on a WU that prevents further copies being sent out?
Perhaps it is already in place for the next batch of new WUs, but does not apply to the ones that have already started.
For example, the 7th copy (name *_06) has just been sent out for the WU that I described in The Bad Type A WUs Thread.

2. Within a quorum, should the values of all of the data in each of the members' running science programs be bit-for-bit identical throughout the run, so that if errors occur, they occur at the same place?
In the abovementioned TS05/ps WU, 3 copies terminated at pctComplete=0.688000 and 1 at 0.447600. In thread DDDT2 - now an Intermittent project , mweisensee says that ts05_a193_ps0000 gave 3 error exits with different % completion. JmBoullier mentions more WUs that terminated at different points, including one where 2 members completed the WU successfully. Furthermore, mweisensee thinks that forcing periodic restarts from checkpoints avoids the errors. Do these things make sense?
Does CHARMM use Monte Carlo methods deep inside its ancient FORTRAN machinery?

Rick,
Sorry if my wording has been confusing but, in my sentence "the most consistent one is the only one which completed fine for both my wingman and me. " "one" stands for "quorum", and obviously this sentence applies to a particular WU which was valid for both wingmen, not to a WU with two valid and x errors.