Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 2
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 255 times and has 1 reply Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
FAAH, big spread in points claimed vs granted

faah16463_ ZINC17041796_ WT2md01450CTP_ 01_ 0-- 607 Valid 10/21/10 13:11:24 10/25/10 02:17:47 7.76 95.9 / 36.6

has something changed? this box normally (70% of the time) underclaims, the rest of the time within 10%. I don't have any other FAAH jobs on results status page for this box to compare.

manager version 6.2.28, vista 32, no wingman

just wondering
[Oct 25, 2010 5:19:22 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Sekerob
Ace Cruncher
Joined: Jul 24, 2005
Post Count: 20043
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: FAAH, big spread in points claimed vs granted

Without wingman and any other results from the same device to compare to, very little can be said. Single/Multicore? What was happening during the first and last 10 minutes of the task on the client? Doing an up/download for instance of a CEP2 beta maybe or anything else big? Note, FAAH and HFCC (AutoDock engine based) have a mini-benchmark in the task to determine computing power and to do QA. See the Zero Redundancy Credit topic in the FAQs for more detail.
----------------------------------------
WCG Global & Research > Make Proposal Help: Start Here!
Please help to make the Forums an enjoyable experience for All!
[Oct 25, 2010 7:42:56 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread