Index  | Recent Threads  | Unanswered Threads  | Who's Active  | Guidelines  | Search
 

Quick Go »
No member browsing this thread
Thread Status: Active
Total posts in this thread: 24
Posts: 24   Pages: 3   [ 1 2 3 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread
Author
Previous Thread This topic has been viewed 4332 times and has 23 replies Next Thread
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Very old Wus still among the results

Hello,

I see at the very last page of my results many WUs successfully validated in January.

Why are they still there? Is there a way to get rid of those?

Thanks!
[May 27, 2011 4:17:27 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very old Wus still among the results

Got 2.5 pages of those completed Feb 2 and before, to include 1 page marked ''No Reply'', probably when I lost a Linux client then. None are listed with a later date, though having done hundreds. Maybe that's the hold up of more rain... techs not transitioning completed work to the master db and on to Galveston ;P


Quorum sample of task that my cruncher did not return, completed by someone else:
ts02_ a423_ sqb006_ 2-- 617 Valid 2-2-11 04:42:47 2-2-11 16:32:29 2.19 22.5 / 22.0
ts02_ a423_ sqb006_ 1-- 617 Valid 23-1-11 04:15:23 24-1-11 03:39:59 2.39 21.5 / 22.0
ts02_ a423_ sqb006_ 0-- - No Reply 23-1-11 04:15:18 2-2-11 04:15:18 0.00 0.0 / 0.0
[May 27, 2011 7:11:19 AM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very old Wus still among the results

I also have one valid since 21 January -

Result Name App Version Number Status Sent Time Time Due /
Return Time CPU Time (hours) Claimed/ Granted BOINC Credit
ts02_ a359_ pda003_ 0-- 617 Valid 1/21/11 21:22:25 1/24/11 13:14:48 3.38 53.2 / 53.6
ts02_ a359_ pda003_ 1-- 617 Valid 1/21/11 21:22:23 1/22/11 15:41:10 4.42 53.9 / 53.6
[May 27, 2011 12:51:47 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
PMH_UK
Veteran Cruncher
UK
Joined: Apr 26, 2007
Post Count: 741
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very old Wus still among the results

I also have several ts02_work units from late Jan, similar batch and dates to above.

Paul.
----------------------------------------
Paul.
[May 27, 2011 7:23:25 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
martin64
Senior Cruncher
Germany
Joined: May 11, 2009
Post Count: 445
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very old Wus still among the results

Also one from April:

dg03_ d194_ ps0000_ 0-- Error 10.04.11 06:52:34 10.04.11 06:55:09 0.00 0.0 / 0.0

...along with 2 pages of valid results from January.

Regards,
Martin
----------------------------------------

[Jun 14, 2011 5:11:47 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
KerSamson
Master Cruncher
Switzerland
Joined: Jan 29, 2007
Post Count: 1664
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very old Wus still among the results

For me the same: several WUs from January and April 2011 remained on the list (around one full page).
Yves
----------------------------------------
[Jun 14, 2011 8:45:32 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Former Member
Cruncher
Joined: May 22, 2018
Post Count: 0
Status: Offline
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very old Wus still among the results

I also have 87 old WU's from the ts02 series and all valid. Date range is 1/21 - 1/24. These things are nearly 6 months old. Interesting that they are still around.
[Jun 14, 2011 11:44:17 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
knreed
Former World Community Grid Tech
Joined: Nov 8, 2004
Post Count: 4504
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very old Wus still among the results

We had to freeze the batch due to higher than normal errors in the batch. We need to clean them out and clear them from your history.
[Jun 15, 2011 1:56:52 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
GB033533
Senior Cruncher
UK
Joined: Dec 8, 2004
Post Count: 190
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very old Wus still among the results

I too have some of these - a dozen all received on 21st Jan in the tso2 series, ranging from a301-a355.
I really like still seeing them listed in my results, especially as they were run on a machine I no longer have. I will miss them when one day they get removed.
----------------------------------------

[Jun 15, 2011 1:57:06 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
sk..
Master Cruncher
http://s17.rimg.info/ccb5d62bd3e856cc0d1df9b0ee2f7f6a.gif
Joined: Mar 22, 2007
Post Count: 2324
Status: Offline
Project Badges:
Reply to this Post  Reply with Quote 
Re: Very old Wus still among the results

After seeing I had 4 from this bad batch of dddt2 tasks I was under the illusion that I had not had one error in over 2 months, but yesterday I saw one CEP2 error appear. Today it's gone from my error list. That's some difference in the hang-around time. I should have remembered that different project behave differently here.
[Jun 15, 2011 6:10:09 PM]   Link   Report threatening or abusive post: please login first  Go to top 
Posts: 24   Pages: 3   [ 1 2 3 | Next Page ]
[ Jump to Last Post ]
Post new Thread